The importance of ontology.
A familiar contemporary dilemma for Christology is:
1.) Christ has an individual human nature
2.) Every individual human nature is a human person
3.) Christ is not a human person.
The three claims cannot all be true, but (2) seems evident from the terms while (1) and (3) are essential to all accounts of the Incarnation. First, if Christ’s human nature were not individual and concrete, then it could not die, be born, suffer, or even be sensed since human nature in general, or as universal, or an essence can do none of these things. Second, if Christ is a human person then, given that all Trinitarian accounts make the Logos of God a person, Christ is two persons. But if this is the case, then the Incarnation is nothing more remarkable than my being a human person and God being one too.
This leaves orthodox Christology as having to…
View original post 219 more words